duuuuuuuuuude : Yeah, they were from Tacoma and were big in the NW from 1965-1967. They had bashed-out, ra...
ship_toaster : kobe raped a girl
Piglet : I did skip epi 3,4,5,6 and went straight to epi 7. As many have commented, it has The Dome...
simones : I love this movie so much; I've been revisiting it many, many times over the years.To me, ...
Alien : I might watch this :)
MorInSound : In every home; on every desk; in every palm - a plasma screen; a monitor; a smartphone--a ...
magiczoo : Oh, this weird little show! So glad you commented and reminded me of it. I don’t remember ...
duuuuuuuuuude : I rented this on Amazon and really enjoyed it. They invented punk rock 14 years before the...
yellow_rose1 : I always knew punk influenced Nirvana, mainly Kurt for sure. However I'm not familiar with...
Smeagoll : thanks i did see that. i stand by my statement (for now) lol. subject to change. i did lik...
This is the kind of movie that could have been good - taking a metaphorical monster (sexual assault/violence against women d/t their gender) and making it a “real” monster. Having a protagonist that may or may not be imagining things is a good idea, since RL sexual assault cases are usually defended by attacking the victim’s credibility.
But they run into the problem of trying to have it both ways - the monster is portrayed as maybe a mentally ill homeless man (it first appears in an alley in a mess that looks like someone’s makeshift shelter), but also a monster. It can only be killed (supposedly) by magical means, but if that’s true we’re not really dealing with a metaphorical monster anymore at all. I think maybe that’s another way of saying it can’t be killed, but that just muddies things up more. Everything about the monster - including the way it kills the one person I can remember actually dying in the movie - suggests it could be her having a psychotic break and that the monster isn’t real, but everything around the monster says it’s real. Not a bad premise for a movie, but confusingly executed.