magically_delicious : You’re the only one who makes any sense.
Honest Review : One of those movies that when it finishes you have more questions than answers. Was a nice...
biker_71 : yes, i suppose you have a point there lol they did conspire to try an take the attention a...
Speed711 : This movie was way over the top with overkill. Feels like they used video game logic shoot...
betty : 🤣🤣 worst chef ever
betty : Why would a leftist believe anything about the democrats, assuming you are talking about t...
snazzydetritus : And how could one get an honest assessment of any religion (including the one he is so obv...
torrac : Says the almighty...
Snakebyte : Keep crying :D
2/5
I’m not sure why this was made. It viewed as a revisit for fan-service, but who thought the original needed a revisit? It was always to be a standalone…we didn’t need a followup to see what happened in a blatantly inaccurate period piece.
Don’t get me wrong, I consider Gladiator to be one of my favorite films, not for accuracy, but for the scope, the beauty, the acting, the sound/music, the well executed/edited story. 24 years later, it holds it’s own as art…and this new one is but a shadow of it, which is curious considering the money thrown at it. I don’t think the performances were that bad, maybe some casting issues, but a weak story, and what seems like a movie that was edited down to fit a time limit some executive demanded.
Worth a watch for some of the fight sequences, but on the whole, it kinda tarnishes the name of the original.