[X]
Report Link
Video has been deleted
Wrong video
Audio out of sync
There was an error converting the video
Other (explain below)

Details:

A fairly well-to-do family takes in two troubled orphans.

  • Currently 3.555555555555556/5
(9 votes)
Ratings: IMDB: 7.1/10
Released: January 10, 1952
Runtime: 98 min
Genres: Comedy
Countries: United States
Companies: Warner Bros. Warner Bros. Pictures
Cast: Cary Grant Betsy Drake Lurene Tuttle Randy Stuart
Crew: Jack Rose Melville Shavelson Anna Perrot Rose Norman Taurog

Trailers (1)

Free Links

Version 1 archive.org 27 views Report Link
  • Currently 4.0/5
(6 votes)
= Low Quality = Medium Quality = High Quality How do I watch these?

Search on other sites

Streaming Services

Buy/Rent

Popular PlaylistsMore

Similar TitlesMore

Room for One More Comments

Post a Comment

Please login to make a comment

Comments

Expand all Spoilers
Frac 0 points 5 years ago. 5/5 stars.

Pretty terrific 1952 movie.Love Cary Grant movies

TisOnlyMe 3 points 4 years ago.

Thanks for the recommendation, that was really sweet, enjoyed it :))x

Manguy1 1 points 3 years ago.

This movie was a popular one in the vein of “The More The Merrier” and “Cheaper By The Dozen”. I’m not sure if it was the first but it was close if not. However this has a feel to it that you won’t find in any modern movie although there is a bit of sappiness. When I see a movie like this from America’s days of Christian Charity I mourn for the modern human. (The fact that I had to say “Human” instead of “Man” just to be Politically Correct” makes me want to weep. “Christian Charity” has become a dirty phrase now because people don’t even know what it is. It’s “Selflessness”.

DW99 -2 points 3 years ago*.
  1. “The More the Merrier” is a romantic comedy about roommates and overcrowding during WWII — it has nothing to do families.
  2. Selflessness is not limited to Christians; that’s one of several problems with the phrase “Christian charity.”
  3. When, exactly, was America’s era of “Christian charity” — the 1st half [edited: first part] of the 20th century, with robber barons, exploitation of workers, lynchings, Jim Crow, anti-Irish / anti-Italian / anti-Jewish prejudice, and contempt for women? Or the mid-20th century, with “separate but equal,” continued lynchings, McCarthyism, and contempt for women?
  4. If you were a woman, you too would question the wisdom of using “man” as a synonym for “human,” not least because women constitute the majority of the world’s population — and also because the word is a relic from an era in which only men had agency in the world.
  5. “Politically correct” is a derisive term used by people who do NOT want everyone in the world to have equal rights, equal protection under the law, and respectful treatment; when I encounter it, I ask the user whether s/he is sure s/he wants to be associated with such a problematic mindset, but I see that I need not ask that question of you.